๐๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ผ๐ป๐น๐ ๐น๐ผ๐ผ๐ธ๐ถ๐ป๐ด ๐ฎ๐ ๐ฝ๐ผ๐๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐ฐ๐ผ๐ป๐๐๐บ๐ฝ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป, ๐๐ผ๐'๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐บ๐ถ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด 85% ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ต๐ฒ actual cost!
In our example from last weekย https://lnkd.in/ehaipvaqย only โฌ1,744 of the total โฌ7,711 monthly savings come from material costs.
Still, we're starting our ROI series here. Why? Because powder consumption is the most visible lever โ but far from the biggest one.
๐ง๐ต๐ฒ ๐บ๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ถ๐ฎ๐น ๐๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด๐ ๐ฏ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐ฎ๐ธ ๐ฑ๐ผ๐๐ป ๐ฎ๐ ๐ณ๐ผ๐น๐น๐ผ๐๐:
๐ด โฌ1,120 from reducing over-application
(2 tons of powder consumption per month ร โฌ14/kg, with 4% savings = โฌ1,120)
โซ โฌ540 from reducing rework
(150 reworked parts at โฌ8 each, with 45% less rework = โฌ540)
โช โฌ84 from reducing scrap
(10 scrap parts at โฌ28 each, with 30% fewer scrap parts = โฌ84)
โก๏ธTotal: โฌ1,744 savings per month
๐ช๐ต๐ฎ๐'๐ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด is that almost one-third of the material savings comes from reducing rework, not from using less powder.
๐๐ป๐ฑ ๐ฒ๐๐ฒ๐ป ๐บ๐ผ๐ฟ๐ฒ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฒ๐๐๐ถ๐ป๐ด: material savings account for only about 23% of the total savings potential in this example.
In the next part of our series, we'll show why rework is often far more expensive than most people think.
Comments